Let’s face it—meeting minutes are essential but... well, they’re not exactly the highlight of anyone’s week. As clerks, we know the drill: note every key point, action item, and “can you repeat that one more time?” Thankfully, AI can make that process a whole lot easier! There are a couple of tools available to handle transcriptions and meeting summaries.
For the purposes of this blog, we’ll dig into two big names making waves: Claude 3.5 vs Sonnet. Which one should you trust with your precious meeting minutes summaries, and why?
Let’s break it down.
Claude 3.5: The Brainy Overachiever
Pros:
Context King: Claude 3.5 can process long conversations without losing track. Even if your meeting starts off from budget reports to what snacks should be at the annual Spring Fling dance, Claude stays on top of it.
Super Accurate Summaries: If you’ve got a legal-heavy or highly technical meeting, Claude shines at pulling out the key points while keeping the nitty-gritty intact.
Flexible Formatting: Need bullet points? A narrative summary? Action item lists? Claude can help.
Cons:
Takes Its Time: Claude’s summaries can be a bit more thorough—which is great for accuracy but can feel like waiting for a slow printer when you’re in a rush.
A Bit Pricey: Quality comes at a cost: Claude 3.5 might stretch your budget a little more than other options.
Best For: Claude is best used to keep meeting ai summary jampacked with details during longer meetings.
Sonnet: The Speedy Scribe
Pros:
Fast and Efficient: Sonnet zips through meeting audio, delivering quick, concise summaries.
Budget-Friendly: If you’re watching the pennies, Sonnet gives you solid summaries without the big price tag.
Simple and User-Friendly: No fancy configurations needed. Just upload the audio, and Sonnet handles the rest.
Cons:
Loves Simplicity: Sonnet sometimes skips over details. If you’re looking for an overview to share or a short summary, Sonnet is the one.
Formatting Limitations: While Sonnet does a good job at basic summaries, it might not offer the same flexible output formats as Claude.
Best For: Great for quick team check-ins or brief planning sessions. When you need something now, Sonnet delivers faster.
The Showdown: Which One Fits Your Needs?
Meeting ai summary sorted! If your meetings are long, detailed, and full of nuanced discussions, Claude 3.5 is your best bet. It’s like having that one coworker who takes obsessive notes and never misses a thing. On the flip side, if speed and simplicity are the name of the game, Sonnet is perfect for those everyday meetings where you just need the basics without the bells and whistles.
Mix and match depending on the meeting type, and before you know it, your minutes will practically write themselves. AI might not be able to pour your coffee, but it sure can make your life a little easier.